After reading, I think the primary audience might be the state House of Representatives and the second audience could be the students. About the tone of the author, I think it represent that the author treats this event seriously. So from the tone, we can feel author’s concerns about the event. The primary audience could take into account his advises about the gun permit in the campus and reconsider the outcome about the gun permit. For students, they may could recognize the truth that they are still immature to have the gun and there is no necessary for them to process the gun in campus.
After reading the article, it is obvious that the primary audience is the chief counsel of the Idaho state legislature, while the secondary audience might be the students in Idaho or the Idaho people. The author used an angry and ironic tone in the article, and this article might change the way of the chief counsel of the Idaho state legislature thinks about legalizing guns on campus by prohibiting them. And also that might effect the students or the people of Idaho by following the change of guns' legislation on campus
The primary audience is the member of the legislature. The secondary audiences are the students. In the article, the author used a tone of disagreeable and angry. For the primary audience, after reading the article, they may think about his suggestions of not permitting guns to the campus. For the secondary audience, he encourages the student to agree with his opinion of prohibiting guns in school.
The primary audience is the chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature. The secondary audience might be all the American teacher and collage student. The author feels insecure about his job now. After reading this piece, the chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature will be more concern about campus security especially he might gives teachers have more right of self-defense in emergency. The other teacher will be more careful when they teaching. The student will know some of their behavior will make the teacher uncomfortable, so that they will stop doing that.
The primary audiences is the chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature and i think the secondary audience may be the Idaho's students.After reading the article, i feel that the author used a very angry and disagreement about the legalize guns in campus. The author is a teacher, he met so many students which were upset or dangerous. The primary audience would think about the outcome which brought by the gun's legislature. and the secondary audience would think that it is really important to prohibiting guns in school to protect themselves.
The primary audiences is the chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature and i think the secondary audience may be the Idaho's students.After reading the article, i feel that the author used a very angry and disagreement about the legalize guns in campus. The author is a teacher, he met so many students which were upset or dangerous. The primary audience would think about the outcome which brought by the gun's legislature. and the secondary audience would think that it is really important to prohibiting guns in school to protect themselves.
The first audience is the chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature, and the second audiences are students and people in university. The author analysis the situation of students enamored seriously. This concern will affect the chief to consider about the situation of students enamored and may protect teachers in different ways, also warn students that their behavior might be make their instructors feel anxious and encourage chief that prohibit bring arms to school.
The first audience is the chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature, and the second audiences are students and people in university. The author analysis the situation of students enamored seriously. This concern will affect the chief to consider about the situation of students enamored and may protect teachers in different ways, also warn students that their behavior might be make their instructors feel anxious and encourage chief that prohibit bring arms to school.
The first audience is the chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature; The second audiences, in my point of view, are the people who concerned about the issue of guns in the campuses. The author, with an easy-going tone, straight-forward and vivid language, tries to show the possible damages guns may bring in campus, and makes them to face the issue with serious attitude. People should realize that the guns actually provide chances to the kind of "bad guys" although "guns don't kill people, people with guns do" from the article.
The primary audience is the chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature. The secondary audience I think are all the American teachers and collage students. The tone of the author is very angry. About his attitude, Legislature will think seriously about gun in the campus. Second audiences like teachers and students will more care their own safe in collage.
The primary audience is the chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature. The secondary audience should be people who care about the bill permitting guns on Idaho's college and university campuses. I think the author is speaking sarcastically. The professor tried to make the audience imagine different situations like "if a student shoot first", "if two armed students are arguing over" and the example of "some drunken frat boys". After reading this article, people may think over the bill and more students may realize they are supposed to learn responsible weapon use.
The primary audience is chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature and the secondary audience is the college students and teachers(especially of Idaho state). Author used ironic and angry tone.For the primary audience, he suggests not to permit weapons on campus whereas, secondary audience i.e. teachers and students are gonna think more about their safety after reading the article.
The primary audience is the chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature. The secondary audience would be the students and people who work in the university. And I think author's tone is not really angry, just a little bit, and somewhat worried about the environment. For the effect on the audience, I think its a suggestion to let people know students or people who come to university should not take guns. And they also can not go to university after drinking. For the reason, I think it's helpful to built a better and safe environment in the university.
The primary audience is the chief counsel of the Idaho state legislature, and the secondary audience could be the students. After reading the article I felt a tone of anger mostly, the author was not so pleasant. The primary audience may take his suggestion in to an account and stop guns going around the campus, so basically prohibiting the guns in collage, while for the secondary audience he could be convincing them not to bring the guns or to agree with his decision.
The primary audience is the chief counsel of the Idaho state legislature, and the secondary audience could be the students. The author tone seems sarcastic as he address this issue. This helps because it invoke his readers mind into what could happen if such bills were passed and legalized. it educate his student about the terrifying fact of legalizing guns in campuses \.
The primary audience are the members of Idaho state legislature counsel. The second audience are students. The motivation of the author write this article is to provide his advice about gun control. His tone is kind of rebuke and serious. He hope that the counsel members really can do something to prohibit gun use on campus.
The primary audience is the chief counsel of the Idaho state legislature. The secondary audiences are the other people who are involved in this legislation. The author’s tone is really worried and concerned because it will put him into danger if guns are permitted on campuses. The message is directly coming from a professor of a university which makes his text more appealing. The audiences should listen to him because they have no idea what it is like to give students a lecture while he might be shot in a matter of seconds.
The primary audience is the the chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature. I think it is important as the legislature has the power in his hands. The secondary audience is high school students and also the people related to these activities. The author is pretty serious in his tone. He wants the safety of the students and school.
The primary audience may be the chief counsel of Idaho and the secondary audience is most likely the students. the author's tone is sort of angry and concerned about the situation. The message is coming directly from a professor so applys directly to the students so they could make a better school campus.
The primary audience is the the chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature and the second audience are the students. The author's tone is serious because he wants to tell people that something need to be done to control the gun to let the campus be safe.
The primary audience is the the chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature and the second audience are the students. The author's tone is serious because he wants to tell people that something need to be done to control the gun to let the campus be safe.
After reading, I think the primary audience might be the state House of Representatives and the second audience could be the students. About the tone of the author, I think it represent that the author treats this event seriously. So from the tone, we can feel author’s concerns about the event. The primary audience could take into account his advises about the gun permit in the campus and reconsider the outcome about the gun permit. For students, they may could recognize the truth that they are still immature to have the gun and there is no necessary for them to process the gun in campus.
ReplyDeleteAfter reading the article, it is obvious that the primary audience is the chief counsel of the Idaho state legislature, while the secondary audience might be the students in Idaho or the Idaho people.
ReplyDeleteThe author used an angry and ironic tone in the article, and this article might change the way of the chief counsel of the Idaho state legislature thinks about legalizing guns on campus by prohibiting them. And also that might effect the students or the people of Idaho by following the change of guns' legislation on campus
The primary audience is the member of the legislature. The secondary audiences are the students.
ReplyDeleteIn the article, the author used a tone of disagreeable and angry. For the primary audience, after reading the article, they may think about his suggestions of not permitting guns to the campus. For the secondary audience, he encourages the student to agree with his opinion of prohibiting guns in school.
The primary audience is the chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature. The secondary audience might be all the American teacher and collage student. The author feels insecure about his job now. After reading this piece, the chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature will be more concern about campus security especially he might gives teachers have more right of self-defense in emergency. The other teacher will be more careful when they teaching. The student will know some of their behavior will make the teacher uncomfortable, so that they will stop doing that.
ReplyDeleteThe primary audiences is the chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature and i think the secondary audience may be the Idaho's students.After reading the article, i feel that the author used a very angry and disagreement about the legalize guns in campus. The author is a teacher, he met so many students which were upset or dangerous. The primary audience would think about the outcome which brought by the gun's legislature. and the secondary audience would think that it is really important to prohibiting guns in school to protect themselves.
ReplyDeleteThe primary audiences is the chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature and i think the secondary audience may be the Idaho's students.After reading the article, i feel that the author used a very angry and disagreement about the legalize guns in campus. The author is a teacher, he met so many students which were upset or dangerous. The primary audience would think about the outcome which brought by the gun's legislature. and the secondary audience would think that it is really important to prohibiting guns in school to protect themselves.
ReplyDeleteThe first audience is the chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature, and the second audiences are students and people in university. The author analysis the situation of students enamored seriously. This concern will affect the chief to consider about the situation of students enamored and may protect teachers in different ways, also warn students that their behavior might be make their instructors feel anxious and encourage chief that prohibit bring arms to school.
ReplyDeleteThe first audience is the chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature, and the second audiences are students and people in university. The author analysis the situation of students enamored seriously. This concern will affect the chief to consider about the situation of students enamored and may protect teachers in different ways, also warn students that their behavior might be make their instructors feel anxious and encourage chief that prohibit bring arms to school.
ReplyDeleteThe first audience is the chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature; The second audiences, in my point of view, are the people who concerned about the issue of guns in the campuses. The author, with an easy-going tone, straight-forward and vivid language, tries to show the possible damages guns may bring in campus, and makes them to face the issue with serious attitude. People should realize that the guns actually provide chances to the kind of "bad guys" although "guns don't kill people, people with guns do" from the article.
ReplyDeleteThe primary audience is the chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature. The secondary audience I think are all the American teachers and collage students. The tone of the author is very angry. About his attitude, Legislature will think seriously about gun in the campus. Second audiences like teachers and students will more care their own safe in collage.
ReplyDeleteThe primary audience is the chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature. The secondary audience should be people who care about the bill permitting guns on Idaho's college and university campuses. I think the author is speaking sarcastically. The professor tried to make the audience imagine different situations like "if a student shoot first", "if two armed students are arguing over" and the example of "some drunken frat boys". After reading this article, people may think over the bill and more students may realize they are supposed to learn responsible weapon use.
ReplyDeleteThe primary audience is chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature and the secondary audience is the college students and teachers(especially of Idaho state). Author used ironic and angry tone.For the primary audience, he suggests not to permit weapons on campus whereas, secondary audience i.e. teachers and students are gonna think more about their safety after reading the article.
ReplyDeleteThe primary audience is the chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature. The secondary audience would be the students and people who work in the university. And I think author's tone is not really angry, just a little bit, and somewhat worried about the environment. For the effect on the audience, I think its a suggestion to let people know students or people who come to university should not take guns. And they also can not go to university after drinking. For the reason, I think it's helpful to built a better and safe environment in the university.
ReplyDeleteThe primary audience is the chief counsel of the Idaho state legislature, and the secondary audience could be the students. After reading the article I felt a tone of anger mostly, the author was not so pleasant. The primary audience may take his suggestion in to an account and stop guns going around the campus, so basically prohibiting the guns in collage, while for the secondary audience he could be convincing them not to bring the guns or to agree with his decision.
ReplyDeleteThe primary audience is the chief counsel of the Idaho state legislature, and the secondary audience could be the students. The author tone seems sarcastic as he address this issue. This helps because it invoke his readers mind into what could happen if such bills were passed and legalized. it educate his student about the terrifying fact of legalizing guns in campuses \.
ReplyDeleteThe primary audience are the members of Idaho state legislature counsel. The second audience are students. The motivation of the author write this article is to provide his advice about gun control. His tone is kind of rebuke and serious. He hope that the counsel members really can do something to prohibit gun use on campus.
ReplyDeleteThe primary audience is the chief counsel of the Idaho state legislature. The secondary audiences are the other people who are involved in this legislation. The author’s tone is really worried and concerned because it will put him into danger if guns are permitted on campuses. The message is directly coming from a professor of a university which makes his text more appealing. The audiences should listen to him because they have no idea what it is like to give students a lecture while he might be shot in a matter of seconds.
ReplyDeleteThe primary audience is the the chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature. I think it is important as the legislature has the power in his hands. The secondary audience is high school students and also the people related to these activities. The author is pretty serious in his tone. He wants the safety of the students and school.
ReplyDeleteThe primary audience may be the chief counsel of Idaho and the secondary audience is most likely the students. the author's tone is sort of angry and concerned about the situation. The message is coming directly from a professor so applys directly to the students so they could make a better school campus.
ReplyDeleteThe primary audience is the the chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature and the second audience are the students. The author's tone is serious because he wants to tell people that something need to be done to control the gun to let the campus be safe.
ReplyDeleteThe primary audience is the the chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature and the second audience are the students. The author's tone is serious because he wants to tell people that something need to be done to control the gun to let the campus be safe.
ReplyDelete