The essay "Saving the Journalism Industry" from the WPL is talking about giving some solutions to saving the Industry. The author Jenkins also gives example to make sure audience get the purpose from the original article. For an example:"Too many contemporary observers continue to fantasize that it is just a matter of time before a new generation ...using digital technologies"; That inspire me to work on my essay. For the Works Cited page, Jenkins also gives clear information to attract audience's eye.
"Gun Rights or Gun Control" by Michelle Faas. At the beginning of the essay, she tell us the background of her essay by using data to make us understand easier, after that, she begin to narrate the argument between two opposite angle. In the main part of the essay, she use the example from the article to explain the pros and cons of gun control without bias, which I need to pay attention on it. At the end of the essay, she use one paragraph for conclusion, which made people feel concise. The citation of the essay also clear and formal to read.
i felt the strength of the essay was mainly the introduction and thats because it gave me a good sense of what the topic is about, basically a good background sense. And after that the paragraphs had both sides, therefore cons and pros and it didn't seem which side she is taking until the conclusion and it seemed like the information that were used were not bias and therefore from popular or scholar resources.
"Gun rights or gun control" introduce the background. Introducing background is can enforce the strength. In article, she introduces the both side of the idea to make topic completely. Author introduces the advantages and disadvantages of the gun control, it's a good introduce. At the end of article, author list the quote in MLA format, it's a right form to make the cite.
"Gun rights or Gun Control" Does a great job of introducing the topic. She gives her readers a background about the topic using data, then she start to introduce the argument between the two sides. In body paragraphs, the author explain the points of the two sides without bias, which is great for an argumentative essay.
Michelle Faas's “Gun Rights or Gun Control" discusses about the research question that what is the safest policy for private owenership and possession of firearms in the United States?. This research is a pro con question that includes two sides supporting Gun control and Gun Rights. Faas introduces both strength and weakness of resources she uses in the essay, she also makes comparison in the end of the essay to compare and contrast the articles she cites in her essay and comes up with one most convincing and successful argument, which maks her essay more logical.
I read "Gun rights or gun control". Following are the strengths of the essay 1. Introducing background, helped me understand the essay better 2. Examples 3. Author presents both side of the argument
As a title, "Gun rights or Gun Control" is a brilliant title because to introduce the topic. In addition to that, she gives her readers a background about the topic by using data and numbers which she can build the argument between two sides. However, she explains the points of both sides with bias which is the right way to write about a debatable topic.
In the article, "Gun rights or Gun Control" , Faas discusses about the topic what is the safest policy for private ownership and possession of firearms in the United States. At the beginning of the article, Faas shows us the background of this topic which makes us be familiar with this topic quickly. In addition, Faas makes examples and uses references in both sides of the topic, which lets us have a whole version of the topic. In the end, Faas also makes comparison of the two different opinions of the topic. This article is sound and convinced to me.
The essay "Saving the Journalism Industry" from the WPL is talking about giving some solutions to saving the Industry. The author Jenkins also gives example to make sure audience get the purpose from the original article. For an example:"Too many contemporary observers continue to fantasize that it is just a matter of time before a new generation ...using digital technologies"; That inspire me to work on my essay. For the Works Cited page, Jenkins also gives clear information to attract audience's eye.
ReplyDelete"Gun Rights or Gun Control" by Michelle Faas. At the beginning of the essay, she tell us the background of her essay by using data to make us understand easier, after that, she begin to narrate the argument between two opposite angle. In the main part of the essay, she use the example from the article to explain the pros and cons of gun control without bias, which I need to pay attention on it. At the end of the essay, she use one paragraph for conclusion, which made people feel concise. The citation of the essay also clear and formal to read.
ReplyDeletei felt the strength of the essay was mainly the introduction and thats because it gave me a good sense of what the topic is about, basically a good background sense. And after that the paragraphs had both sides, therefore cons and pros and it didn't seem which side she is taking until the conclusion and it seemed like the information that were used were not bias and therefore from popular or scholar resources.
ReplyDelete"Gun rights or gun control" introduce the background. Introducing background is can enforce the strength. In article, she introduces the both side of the idea to make topic completely. Author introduces the advantages and disadvantages of the gun control, it's a good introduce. At the end of article, author list the quote in MLA format, it's a right form to make the cite.
ReplyDelete"Gun rights or Gun Control" Does a great job of introducing the topic. She gives her readers a background about the topic using data, then she start to introduce the argument between the two sides. In body paragraphs, the author explain the points of the two sides without bias, which is great for an argumentative essay.
ReplyDeleteMichelle Faas's “Gun Rights or Gun Control" discusses about the research question that what is the safest policy for private owenership and possession of firearms in the United States?. This research is a pro con question that includes two sides supporting Gun control and Gun Rights. Faas introduces both strength and weakness of resources she uses in the essay, she also makes comparison in the end of the essay to compare and contrast the articles she cites in her essay and comes up with one most convincing and successful argument, which maks her essay more logical.
ReplyDeleteXinye Wu
I read "Gun rights or gun control". Following are the strengths of the essay
ReplyDelete1. Introducing background, helped me understand the essay better
2. Examples
3. Author presents both side of the argument
As a title, "Gun rights or Gun Control" is a brilliant title because to introduce the topic. In addition to that, she gives her readers a background about the topic by using data and numbers which she can build the argument between two sides. However, she explains the points of both sides with bias which is the right way to write about a debatable topic.
ReplyDeleteIn the article, "Gun rights or Gun Control" , Faas discusses about the topic what is the safest policy for private ownership and possession of firearms in the United States. At the beginning of the article, Faas shows us the background of this topic which makes us be familiar with this topic quickly. In addition, Faas makes examples and uses references in both sides of the topic, which lets us have a whole version of the topic. In the end, Faas also makes comparison of the two different opinions of the topic. This article is sound and convinced to me.
ReplyDelete